Hi, I notice a "possible" mistake in the Puzzle booklet: Example #6 (Kropki) - in my opinion between the first cell in the second row and the first cell in the third row a black dot is missing...
Am I correct with the assumption that "no dot between adjacent cells means no property at all"?
Thanks for your response,
Riccared from Italy
Hi riccared,
Hi riccared,
you are correct, there is indeed a mistake in the instruction booklet - a black dot is missing. "No dot means no property at all" is correct.
The puzzle itself has been checked much more thoroughly than the example, we have made sure there won't be such a mistake there.
Regards,
Ulrich
Kropki
Hi all, corrected Puzzle IB has been posted to our site. Thank you